ETS told me, who take the 080427's ibt test, "naked":

Reading  Skills
Level
Your Performance

Reading
High(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts.

Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically

• have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;
• can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex;
• can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and
• can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.

Listening  Skills
Level
Your Performance

Listening
High(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information.

When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can

• understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied;
• distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
• understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
• recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
• understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
• synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.

Speaking  Skills
Level
Your Performance

Speaking about familiar topics
Limited(1.5 - 2.0)

Your responses indicate some difficulty speaking in English about everyday experiences and opinions. Listeners sometimes have trouble understanding you because of noticeable problems with pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary. While you are able to respond partially to the questions, you are not able to fully develop your ideas, possibly due to limited vocabulary and grammar.

Speaking about campus situations
Fair(2.5 - 3.0)

Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading material and experiences typically encountered by university students. You are able to convey relevant information about conversations, newspaper articles, and campus bulletins; however, some details are missing or inaccurate. Limitations of grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation at times cause difficulty for the listener. However, they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.

Speaking about academic course content
Limited(1.5 - 2.0)

In your responses, you are able to use English to talk about the basic ideas from academic reading or lecture materials, but, in general, you include few relevant or accurate details. It is sometimes difficult for listeners to understand your responses because of problems with grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation. Overall, you are able to respond in a general way to the questions, but the amount of information in your responses is limited and the expression of ideas is often vague and unclear.

Writing  Skills
Level
Your Performance

Writing based on reading and listening
Fair(2.5 - 3.5)

You responded to the task, relating the lecture to the reading, but your response indicates weaknesses such as

• an important idea or ideas may be missing, unclear, or inaccurate;
• there may be unclarity in how the lecture and the reading passage are related; and/or
• grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.

Writing based on knowledge and experience
Fair(2.5 - 3.5)

You expressed ideas with reasons, examples, and details, but your response indicated weaknesses such as

• you may not provide enough specific support and development for your main points;
• your ideas may be difficult to follow because of how you organize your essay or because of the language you use to connect your ideas; and/or
• grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.

cai  li  bao ce  <-拼音哦                                            okawari           
才 力 勹 刂（找汉字很辛苦也很脑残，尽量长得像孙子オカワリ才好吧）：
L+4 W+5 S+2+(喂，真的有好好在说吗) 
等杀鸡结束了再说吧

活到如今累到死啊，我们来打理打理记事本上最近要解决的未完成事项：

DSP：Ch3，DFT那图，到底啥玩意儿；Ch4，FFT还不会啊？；Matlab的Ch4有题讨论CZT算法的，有没有兴趣追求卓越挑战极限？

HF Circuit：至今耻辱的是Ch2一砣和Ch4一砣总共两大滩高频的题至今没碰过，不行啊不行，要最大危机了。此外，综合作业选什么好呢？C类放大器？调幅发射接受？调频调相发射接受？还要SPICE仿真还要达标WGC这号老师还什么标准都不说……活脱脱霍永第二啊……

Xilinx ISE实验：综合实验，选了交通灯控制器，值得庆幸的是在一个运气较背且脑力耗散无数的日子（比如五月21号）理论部分完成，仿真成功，啊哈哈，啊哈哈哈，Minami Haruke……让明天下午的实验板打击我吧

CMOS：既然设定好了模范动心了方向，那么朝着模拟的康庄大道小跑吧，怎么？打印好的论文还不看啊，不看还想等到猴年马月？另外，CMOS已经讲解到放大器了，早上因为头裂没去吧？快补啊笨蛋！CMOS子电路比如什么Cascode电流源电流镜也还云里雾里呢。

SOC：自从VHDL过渡到CPLD和FPGA开始就不知道老罗在侃什么……真的好累啊，煎熬啊，冲啊……

Redbible：永远的十字架永远的痛，因为你，我tmd还有时间调理身体么，我tmd还有时间欣赏祖国河山么，我tmd连青藏高原都只能含泪舍去了。怨念啊……好想报仇啊……

此外还有时不时的杂碎比如科技节奥运火炬毕业暨校庆晚会Prof.TML(智商较低的老女人，德国属，将word奉之如神明，找到御用秘书后变本加厉的剥削，且小秘并非它带的烟酒僧，mmd，真该诅咒这死胖子老女人)。暑假就好了？暗无天日啊兄弟姐妹们，暑假一堆十字架……

实验十二：数字频率计的叙述部分只有寥寥数字，不过替实验者划分好了系统的各个模块：控制部分、计数、锁存以及传统的LED数码管配套的扫描和BCD译码器，再加上附属的若干分频器。各个模块用VHDL整出来之后生成元件图，最终得到的数字频率计Schematic是这样的（几个大模块的摆放位置不好做啊，造成比重不匀右下角缺了一块，温莉的话又会说毫无艺术美感的炼成了）：

实验设想用左下的Key A和Key B来控制四选一电路选择接入四个待测信号（Freq_DIS_TEST from 1 to 4）。上次在Xilinx板子上已经察觉出计数和锁存的代码有问题了，就看下次如何。
计数部分的代码没什么稀奇，就是有六个一位十进制计数器分别负责数码管上6个数位的计数，然后级联得到能从0到999999的计数器。锁存……老罗的书再一次玩弄了我们，不，应该说是我们自己的不仔细，下次看看Load设成低电平有效的效果如何。小贴一下控制部分的代码，欢迎拍砖。
library IEEE;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_ARITH.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_UNSIGNED.ALL;
entity CTRL is
    Port ( RST : in  STD_LOGIC;
           CLK_REF : in  STD_LOGIC;
           CNT_EN : buffer  STD_LOGIC;
           CNT_CLR : out  STD_LOGIC;
           CNT_LD : buffer  STD_LOGIC);
end CTRL;

architecture Behavioral of CTRL is
begin
process(CLK_REF, RST)
begin
if RST='1' then
    CNT_EN  <= '0';
    CNT_LD  <= '0';
    CNT_CLR <= '0';
    else if rising_edge(CLK_REF) then
        CNT_LD <= (CNT_EN);
        CNT_EN <= not(CNT_EN);
    end if;
end if;
if (CLK_REF='0' and CNT_EN='0') then
    CNT_CLR<='1';
    else CNT_CLR<='0';
end if;
end process;
end Behavioral;

实验怎么说下午啊晚上啊什么时候钻研一下有想法了就能用vhdl什么的慢慢搞出来，但说到杂碎的杂事，那就恶心多了。为了本周一（5.12）而在周末挑灯夜读的我本想CMOS考完之后可以睡上一觉。谁知夜里就要赶出所谓的ppt和讲稿，一夜没了。——之后若干天由于DSP以及matlab又有几个小时睡眠泡汤那是后话——但我后来知道有成千上万人在同样的时间无法安眠我自己也没什么好说了。在此表态，我已经做好了让各种脑残星以及大小犬儒者唾骂的准备，我本月的银行债务有RMB 2k以上，但我捐了我下礼拜的饭钱，包括那饱含感情的20元，来吧，骂我吧。这种灾难下面，大家冷静该好好学习好好学习，好好消费好好消费，学的东西是自己的，创造价值并消费价值让国家剥削也是捐助的方式。顺便提，魔都这边的血库满了……

Fate是好动画，但相比Saber的英气来说，远阪那样的魔术师更让人着迷。但无奈Saber人气很高Saber控无处不在，就连C71上Saber的抱枕都比远阪的靠枕好看得多，也贵的多的多。有字幕组把名字翻译成命运长夜，但就我个人这礼拜极度渴望睡眠的心态来讲，称它为熬夜的命好了。

关于十位个位的数字分离器（Entity名为Num_HLD），难道真的加数和被加数的位数改变（4bit换成5bit）就要全部重写么？贴上code（无知识产权欢迎引用。）请诸君拍砖。帮帮忙，初步问题是h和l时序仿真时的一周期错位，因为l口初始周期为高阻态而h则没有。后引入信号h_tmp，这下倒好，现在h和l在初始周期有高阻态Z，同步倒同步了，与q的错位该怎么办？

另外两个，case form 和 if-else-if form当算法伪码来读的用注释符号标记起来。对语句的修改也用注释保留下来。

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Company: OOXX
-- Engineer: rats
--
-- Create Date:    13:00:19 04/16/2008
-- Design Name:
-- Module Name:    Num_HLD - Behavioral
-- Project Name:
-- Target Devices:
-- Tool versions:
-- Description: Gundam, orewa Gundam.
--
-- Dependencies: Parent for BCD Decoder, linking with port h and l
--
-- Revision: many times, zetsubou!!!
-- Revision 0.01 - File Created
-- Revision 0.50 - an integer factor introduced
-- Additional Comments:
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
library IEEE;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_ARITH.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_UNSIGNED.ALL;

---- Uncomment the following library declaration if instantiating
---- any Xilinx primitives in this code.
--library UNISIM;
--use UNISIM.VComponents.all;

entity Num_HLD is
    Port ( q : in  STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (5 DOWNTO 0);
           h : out  STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (3 DOWNTO 0);
           l : out  STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (3 DOWNTO 0));
end Num_HLD;

architecture BEHAV_HLD of Num_HLD is
--signal q_tmp: STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (5 DOWNTO 0);           --so many signals for the synchronized input/output only
signal l_tmp: STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (5 DOWNTO 0);
signal h_tmp: STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (3 DOWNTO 0);
begin
PROCESS(q)
variable q_int: integer;
BEGIN
    --q_tmp <= q;
    q_int:=conv_integer(q);

    CASE q_int IS
        WHEN 0 to 9   => h_tmp <= "0000"; l_tmp <= q;
        WHEN 10 to 19 => h_tmp <= "0001"; l_tmp <= q-"010000";
        WHEN 20 to 29 => h_tmp <= "0010"; l_tmp <= q-"010100";
        --WHEN 30 => h <= "0011"; l_tmp <="000000";
        --WHEN 31 => h <= "0011"; l_tmp <="000001";
        WHEN 30 to 39 => h_tmp <= "0011"; l_tmp <= q-"011110";
        WHEN 40 to 49 => h_tmp <= "0100"; l_tmp <= q-"101000";
        --WHEN 48 => h <= "0100"; l_tmp <="001000";
        --WHEN 49 => h <= "0100"; l_tmp <="001001";
        WHEN 50 to 59 => h_tmp <= "0101"; l_tmp <= q-"110010";
        WHEN 60 to 63 => h_tmp <= "0110"; l_tmp <= q-"111100";
        WHEN OTHERS => h_tmp <= "ZZZZ"; l_tmp <="ZZZZZZ";
        END CASE;
    h <= h_tmp;                                                    --h and l synchronized but q.... see the test bench waveform for detail.
    l <= l_tmp(3)&l_tmp(2)&l_tmp(1)&l_tmp(0);
-- part2, original divider code, case form, fatal problem: WHEN xx TO xx, xx cannot define as std type.
-- so, just for algorithmic view.
--    CASE q IS
--        WHEN "000000" to "001001" => h <= "0000"; l <=q(3)&q(2)&q(1)&q(0);
--        WHEN "001010" to "001111" => h <= "0001"; l <=(q(3)&q(2)&q(1)&q(0)-"1010");
--        WHEN "010000" to "010011" => h <= "0001"; l <=q(3)&q(2)&q(1)&q(0) + "0110";
--        WHEN "010100" to "011101" => h <= "0010"; l <=q(3)&q(2)&q(1)&q(0) - "0100";
--        WHEN "011110" => h <= "0011"; l <= "0000";
--        WHEN "011111" => h <= "0011"; l <= "0001";
--        WHEN "100000" to "100111" => h <= "0011"; l <=q(3)&q(2)&q(1)&q(0) + "0010";
--        WHEN "101000" to "101111" => h <= "0100"; l <=q(3)&q(2)&q(1)&q(0) - "1000";
--        WHEN "110000" => h <= "0100"; l <= "1000";
--        WHEN "110001" => h <= "0100"; l <= "1001";
--        WHEN "110010" to "111011" => h <= "0101"; l <=q(3)&q(2)&q(1)&q(0) - "0010";
--        WHEN "111100" to "111111" => h <= "0110"; l <=q(3)&q(2)&q(1)&q(0) - "1100";
-- END CASE;

-- part3, an if-else-if form copyed from lsj with permission. He's port definition differs a lot, so just as a reference.
-- //Noting that c is as q(5) in my case of port q and H or L's length (4 DOWNTO 0), differs from my previous version.
-- if(q<="01001"and c='0') then
--     H<="00000";L<=q;
--        elsif(q>="01010"and q<="10011"and c='0') then
--            H<="00001";L<=q-"01010";
--            elsif(q>="10100"and q<="11101"and c='0') then
--                H<="00010";L<=q-"10100";
--                elsif(q>="11110"and q<="11111"and c='0') then
--                    H<="00011";L<=q-"01010";
--                    elsif(q>="00000"and q<="100111"and c='1') then
--                            H<="00011";L<=q-"100000";
--                            elsif(q>="01000"and q<="10001"and c='1') then
--                                H<="00100";L<=q-"101000";
--                                elsif(q>="10010"and q<="11011"and c='1') then
--                                    H<="00101";L<=q-"110010";
--                                    elsif(q>="11100"and q<="11111"and c='1') then
--                                        H<="00110";L<=q-"111100";
--    end if;
END PROCESS;
end BEHAV_HLD;

总之就是这样小小的一个HLD，搞得实验室乌烟瘴气的也是它。nn小时不睡觉为了消除Error也是它，其他模块都……唉，最后的Schematic是这样的。

请不要将河蟹的触手伸到我的日志，请不要逼着让我们HIT仰望星空长达4个学期。请不要让我也找个space自由版随着.net的河蟹同呼吸。

.net今年已多次收到公安网警的关照

.net在那种时候总是有临时自[beep]版可以呼吸呼吸美[beep]新鲜空气。

霎那间，这种奇妙的现象组织对抗可浓缩到几个脑袋上。

网特找咱谈话了，网特找咱签字了，在这期间，skydrive也给网特关了起来。咱只剩下为数不多的比如wallop，googlepages这种地方可以碎碎念。北美服务器是好啊，[beep]法保护。

HIT好地方，天高云淡，仰望星空。我们还有仰望星空典藏版认同卡，仰望星空101校庆石碑……

哦对了，.net的JD版上baron的摩根系列平息了之后，是不是觉得生活又开始空虚起来？那来看看[URL->]东施级别的泼妇表演吧。

都德，一辈子只说法语，所以老罗说他法国土鳖。

某さん，其实有许多さん，东南西北方圆百里脱不出宝山南汇。自己天天浪费的天然气都不知哪里产的还叫嚣独立独立（FrXX，ShaXXhai），所以我说他们是上海土鳖。

某国民，一直喜欢意淫历史，且不翻阅领国典籍，将楚人屈原，史记司马，降汉关羽，马厩耶稣等一干人追认为棒子祖宗。所以我们说他们是棒子土鳖，东亚愕然，东瀛则抢注了泡菜。

某国民，在客观主观多方原因下没有机会或从不看cnn，bbc，东森，NHK，朝日，联合早报，HK朝廷台比如凤凰卫视，不读报，接受洗脑十几年后开始叫骂人家怎么怎么欺负国家了，要去抗议了要去屠杀了。我们虽然认他们为土鳖，但碍于直言会引起幼稚的内讧，只得尊他们为民族主义者。一群脑子不清的土鳖。

很久不听钉宫这么说了
バカバカ大バカ！

难不成我也有钉宫病？